Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 07:54

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Observations from Day 2 of minicamp | OTAs & Minicamp - Cleveland Browns
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Fiserv’s stock surges as it teams with Circle to join the stablecoin party - MarketWatch
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Are you happy that soon we will never hear from Kamala Jones again?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What are some of the greatest marketing disasters in history?
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Vibe Coding, Windsurf and Anthropic, ChatGPT Connectors - Stratechery by Ben Thompson